larger smaller reset

Mengapa Gempa Berkekuatan 8,7 SR Tidak Menyebabkan Tsunami?

oleh : Joe Vialls 
 5 April 2005
When the Eurasian tectonic plate tilted upwards during the 90 second earthquake on 28 March 2005, it created a brand new island offshore Sumatra. We can use this new island to prove that the March quake was real, and also to prove that the fake quake of December 26, 2004, was a nuclear war crime on an unprecedented scale.
In the center frame, Sumatran citizens sit on an undamaged road surface after the faint 13-second "Richter 8.5" nuclear tremor on 26 December 2004. Now compare this frame with those on the left and right, both of which were taken immediately after the 90-second Richter 8.7 earthquake on 28 March 2005. Complete shock, awesome property damage, and, as we shall see later, a brand-new island offshore Sumatra.

 When the earth roared for 90 seconds late in the evening of March 28, two events follows swiftly on its heels. The first was easily the most obvious, with thousands of buildings destroyed on the Island of Nias and on West Sumatra. Much further east, building collapsed as far away as Medan, and several large concrete structures cracked in Malaysia and Thailand.

 The second was that as a direct result of media brainwashing in December 2004, national governments including Thailand and Sri Lanka swiftly sent out makeshift 'tsunami warnings' to all of their coastal towns. This second action caused at least four deaths through panic that could easily have been avoided, because an earthquake at a convergence fault like the Sumatran Trench, cannot create a tsunami under any circumstances.

 This curious reality was discussed at some length in my earlier tsumani reports, but as a brief refresher, a convergence fault is where one tectonic plate slides under the other. There is no giant collision, but instead, the shattering roar of one huge plate grinding along the underside of the next. Both plates are underwater, so although one might rise slightly, the other will drop by exactly the same amount, each displacing (taking up) the same quantity of water. As a result, excess water displacement, essential for any tsunami, is zero.

 All of a sudden, at the end of March, western scientists were faced with the impossible task of explaining why the December 'earthquake' (originally declared by NOAA as 8.5 on the Richter Scale), had produced a deadly tsunami, but the more powerful 8.7 real earthquake at the same epicenter in March, had not. Faced with mission impossible, the scientists followed the established media lead, and invented lies they thought sounded plausible. As the London Independent newspaper noted on March 30:

 "Scientists are still grappling with the mystery of why such a large earthquake under the ocean did not produce a sizeable tsunami. One thing is certain, however, the Earth did not move as it did on Boxing Day when 10m-high waves killed up to 300,000 people around the Indian Ocean.

 "Brian Baptie of the British Geological Survey in Edinburgh said that it would take some days before seismologists can work out precisely what happened on Monday when northern Sumatra was rocked by an earthquake that measured 8.7 on the Richter scale. 'It is very difficult at the moment to understand why there was not a tsunami following an earthquake this size. One possibility is that its epicentre may have been deeper.' "

 Because the shock effects at the surface were fully 8.7 in nature, and measured as such by both Indonesian and Indian seismic stations, Baptie was either lying or perhaps merely ignorant. But others followed his lead, and the NOAA and media then arbitrarily upped the December nuclear event to a ridiculous 9.3 on the Richter Scale, hoping that the bigger number might help to fool television viewers.

 In order to confuse things still further, the BBC showed a graphic in which it moved the December epicenter further north, and the March epicenter further south and east, thus creating the television illusion that the two events were 200 miles apart, and were absolutely NOT connected to each other. Complete rubbish of course. As the chart below reflects, both the Indonesian and Indian seismic stations show the same epicenter for both events.


 In the immediate aftermath of the December thermonuclear explosion in the Sumatran Trench, the media was groping around for a parallel event, especially after the Indian Government pointed out harshly that "We don't have tsunamis in the Indian Ocean". Clearly the Indians had to be put down swiftly, before the western public has time to become justifiable suspicious. How to do this? Easy, the media invented a fraudulent 'giant tsunami' precedent dating back to 1833. Believe me, only the mighty New York Times is allowed to rewrite history in this manner.

 At the time of the 1833 earthquake, the locals were more than capable of being able to read, write, and keep accurate journals of events. So were the Dutch colonials authorities in Batavia (now Jakarta, Indonesia), who back then were much admired for their meticulous book keeping. There are copious written records of property damage caused by the earthquake itself, but not a single word about any tsunami at all. So either the Dutch Colonial authorities were lying in 1833, or the New York Times is lying in 2004/2005. You choose whichever one you think is the most likely culprit.

 During the undisputed 9.0 earthquake of 1833, a new island was raised out of the sea offshore Sumatra, represented in pink on the chart shown above. This happened simply because the western edge of the Eurasian Plate tilted upwards, as the Indo-Australian Plate slid underneath it, thereby exposing more of the Eurasian Plate seabed. So this new 'island' had always been there, with the tilting plate finally exposing it above the old high water mark. A bit like the tide going out, but never coming back in.

 One hundred and seventy-one years later, during the March 28 earthquake, another much smaller island was exposed on the Eurasian Plate to the west of Nias island, which is entirely predictable when you think about it. The Eurasion Plate had tilted up slightly again, but not as much as it did in 1833, because this most recent event measured only 8.7 on the Richter Scale. This is a hundred times less powerful than the monster 9.0 earthquake of 1833, so smaller quake = smaller upwards tilt of the Eurasian Plate.

 The implications of this simple truth for the conniving liars in the western media are both obvious and disturbing. They have now collectively and fraudulently raised the Richter reading for the December nuclear event from the original 6.4 recorded by both the Indonesian and Indian authorities, through giant creative leaps to a current high of 9.3, which in turn is a hundred times more powerful than the monster earthquake of 1833.

 Fine, using basic math (which unlike physics is not theoretical), and knowing the average depth of the continental shelf to the west of Sumatra, we can prove that a "9.3" earthquake would permanently expose at least 60,000,000 more acres of seabed. In fact, you could now walk all the way from Aceh to Nias Island without getting your feet wet, provided you followed a semi-circular route.

 The fact that you cannot make this walk, simply proves conclusively that the media and its tame prostitute 'scientists' have been lying all the way for the USA. This is probably essential for those who authorized and executed the monstrous Boxing Day war crime, and who don't want to get caught with their nuclear pants down, having already murdered more than 300,000 Asians with a single thermonuclear weapon. Moreover, bearing in mind the position of the Pacific Trenches relative to Japan and China, these clinically insane madmen may mave more mass murders in mind, using very similar techniques.


The left frame shows the coastline of Nias Island, which is now nearly two feet higher out of the water after the 90-second earthquake on March 28. More convincing is the right frame, which shows the 'new' island out to the west of Nias, and thus closer to the extreme western edge of the Eurasian Plate. Before the earthquake on March 28, this structure was a 6" coral reef, completely submerged at high tide. Now at high tide this reef has been transformed into a new island, with an overall elevation of 4' 10". The black band around the base, shows clearly how much of the seabed was permanently lifted out of the water by the March 8.7 magnitude earthquake.

 The media is not overwhelmingly clever, but simply exploits the obvious fact that 99% of its viewing and reading public are not specialists in urban warfare, or aviation, nuclear weapons or tectonic plate movements, and so on. This knowledge has served the media's masters very well, or at least it used to serve them very well, until the Internet started to really blossom out around the world.

 Nowadays there are thousands of experts, many of them retired with a lot of time on their hands, who derive considerable pleasure from exposing these media lies and deceptions. It has almost become a sport, in which the establishment media side is steadily losing more and more games to the increasingly professional teams of Internet independents.

 With stories like the Sumatran Earthquake, the establishment media does the best it can, hiring two-bit junior scientists and magicians to try and keep you fooled for longer, but in the end they are undermined by real science on the Internet. And the big trick right now (in fact the biggest game in town) is to make you believe that a Richter 6.4 earthquake on December 26, created a massive tidal wave powerful enough to murder 300,000+ people, while the infinitely more powerful Richter 8.7 earthquake on March 28 barely rippled the waters of the Indian Ocean. Hence the fraudulently increased Richter values, and creatively moving the single real epicenter to two different positions, 200 miles apart.

 It does not stop there. The public in general keeps asking more and more awkward questions, leading to the media being obliged to elaborate on its basic lies, sometimes in truly hilarious fashion. This was particularly so when one scientist (I use the term 'scientist' in its loosest sense), did a global piece in which he used graphics to explain how the December 26 'earthquake' managed to cause the giant tsunami that murdered 300,000+ people. Take a look at the two frames below, which I 'grabbed' from his television presentation:


 The predictably boring 'scientist' started by telling television viewers that it is "water displacement" which causes all tsunamis. As with most media deceptions, this was part truth and part lie, making it far more difficult for a layman to decode.

 Water displacement happens all the time in the deep oceans, for example giant underwater landslides on mid-ocean ridges etc, but these do not and cannot cause tsunamis, because of Archimedes' Principle, which I explained in detail in the earlier tsunami reports.

 To recap briefly, when two large submerged objects change position, they are merely exchanging their water displacements. Because no new rock has been added to the ocean floor (as it would be in the case of a new volcano, for example), there is no EXCESS water displacement to increase the level of the ocean, and lots of excess water is essential for any tsunami. So, no excess water displacement = no tsunami. It really is as simple as that.

 Somehow the establishment media had to reverse this truth and make you believe the opposite, which is where the illusory moving graphic shown on television last week comes into the picture. In the left-hand frame, the 'scientist' was explaining that in the Sumatran (also known as "Suma" and "Sundra") Trench, the Indo-Australian tectonic plate had slid beneath the Eurasian tectonic plate, which of course is true. But then he said that this action had raised the entire Eurasian tectonic plate so far, that water displacement caused the tsunami. This was a bare faced provable lie, and the point at which the heavy illusion was triggered.

 As any advertising executive or psychologist will confirm, the human eye is first drawn to the top-right hand corner of a page, which is why this premier position commands a higher advertising price than (say) the lower left-hand corner. Now take a closer look at the top right-hand corners of the two frames above, which were grabbed by me from the moving film. What do you see, or, more importantly, what does your brain think that it sees?

 In the left frame you can see the Indo-Australian plate start to slide diagonally to the right underneath the Eurasian plate, with the Eurasian plate starting to rise (tilt) slightly as a result. The right frame was grabbed about two seconds later, showing the Eurasian plate rising up even further, and apparently squeezing the ocean out of the top of the frame. So the illusory subliminal suggestion at this stage, is that the water above the Eurasian plate is being squeezed out above sea level, and thus causes a tsunami.

 In order to drive the first illusion home, this footage was immediately followed by another moving graphic of a huge wave-train, allegedly the 'tsunami' resulting from the first illusion. You can laugh as much as you want to, but this is no laughing matter. About 99.9% of the viewing public saw this event only once at 35 frames per second, and it would have been very convincing for all viewers without any real knowledge of Archimedes' work.

 The two still frames above expose the illusion for what it really was. If you study them carefully for a few seconds, your eyes and brain start to see the whole picture, rather than merely catching a glimpse of the preferred top right corners. As the Eurasion plate on the right rises, the Indo-Australian plate on the left sinks downwards exactly the same distance. Because the two plates are in contact with one another, it is impossible for them to do anything else. Have you got that bit?

 Fine, now look at the actual area of ocean in each frame very carefully, remembering that both tectonic plate structures are completely submerged under water. As the Eurasian plate rises, the water above it simply moves to the left, in order to fill the exact same void volume space left by the sinking Indo-Australian plate. There is absolutely no excess displacement, and without excess displacement you cannot possibly have a tsunami. Thus we need to look for an alternative way of generating sufficient energy to displace the hundreds of millions of tons of water needed for the December 26 event.


After the December 26 thermonuclear weapon was detonated in the Sumatra Trench, Australian authorities knocked back all requests for seismic traces of the event, using stupid excuses like "our equipment wasn't switched on", "Australian seismographs cannot record above 8.0 on the Richter Scale", and "You must ask the American authorities about that". In other words, Australian officials were ordered to lie to the Australian public. This was all forgotten on March 28 this year, when Australian government geophysicists excitedly displayed the seismic trace of the Sumatran 8.7 earthquake, thus proving their equipment could read any magnitude, and furthermore proving they blatantly lied back in December. Put bluntly, New York has Australia's officials by the balls.

 Because the required energy is so huge